Avatar of admin

by

Politico Op-Ed: The Founding Fathers Would Have Protected Your Smart Phone

May 28, 2014 in Politics & Elections

Privacy is a core American value. For 235 years, the Fourth Amendment has protected us from unwarranted searches of our personal belongings. All the while, technology has been changing where and how we keep those belongings. On April 29, the Supreme Court held oral arguments in two cases, Riley v. California and United States v. Wurie. At question is whether the police can search the contents of a phone without a warrant during an arrest. At stake is whether technological advancements have rendered one of our most treasured civil liberties obsolete.

Today, many Americans keep their entire lives on their phones: family photos, emails, calendar appointments, Internet searches and even location history. Considered separately, each of these categories can reveal very private information. Taken together, they can present a pretty good picture of who you are, what you do, where you go, what you read and what you write. What protection does the Constitution offer them from suspicionless search by the government?

The Fourth Amendment grants to the people the right to be ‘secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.’ It did not find its way into the Constitution by accident. It was, rather, a specific response to a principal grievance of colonial Americans under British rule – namely, the use of the ‘general warrant’ whereby the crown gave officials almost unfettered authority to search colonial homes, rifle through papers and scour personal belongings.

As the Constitutional Accountability Center explains in its friend-of-the-court brief in Riley and Wurie, ‘Stated simply, the Framers wanted to strip the government of the arbitrary power to rifle through a person’s belongings in the hope of finding something incriminating.’

There can be little doubt that the modern smartphone is today’s equivalent of our Founders’ ‘papers and effects.’

The Fourth Amendment protects us from unreasonable, warrantless searches of these modern-day versions of ‘papers and effects.’ Indeed, as the Cato Institute observes in its own friend-of-the-court brief, allowing for warrantless searches of cellphones ‘would throw open too-wide a door onto suspects’ personal and private information without judicial supervision. Cellphones are doorways into people’s lives as broad as the front doors of their homes.’

The government argued that public safety demands the police have unfettered liberty to search a person under arrest. This is a false tension between liberty and security; robust protection of our Fourth Amendment rights can coexist with the …read more

Source: RAND PAUL

Leave a reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.