You are browsing the archive for 2015 June 02.

Avatar of admin

by admin

TODAY: Congress Voting on Numerous Amendments to Reign in Troubled Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA)

June 2, 2015 in PERSONAL LIBERTY

By drosenfeld

Amendments Would Prohibit DEA from Undermining State Marijuana Laws; Shut Down DEA’s Controversial Bulk Collection Surveillance Programs; Cut Agency’s Budget

Amendments Come in Wake of Recent Forced Resignation of Agency’s Head, Michele Leonhart

WASHINGTON, D.C.—As the U.S. House of Representatives considers the Fiscal Year 2016 Commerce, Justice, and Science Appropriations bill today and tomorrow, legislators could vote on at least seven amendments designed to reduce the power of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and cut its budget.

June 2, 2015

Drug Policy Alliance

read more

…read more

Source: DRUG POLICY

Avatar of admin

by admin

Thursday Event: Everything You Wanted to Know About Marijuana Reform in New York

June 2, 2015 in PERSONAL LIBERTY

By drosenfeld

Leading Elected Officials, Advocates, and Industry Experts Answer Questions About NY’s Medical Marijuana Law, How to End Marijuana Arrests, and Upcoming Legislation to Tax and Regulate Marijuana

Event at abc home to Benefit the Drug Policy Alliance’s Work to Fix New York’s Broken Marijuana Policies

What is the status of medical marijuana in New York? How can one get a medical card or a dispensary license? How can we end racially biased marijuana arrests in New York? Will NY tax and regulate marijuana like Colorado and Washington? Come get the answers to these questions and more. Join the Drug Policy Alliance, along with leaders in the marijuana industry, policymakers, experts, and patients to get an insider perspective on the state of marijuana policy reform in New York.

June 2, 2015

Drug Policy Alliance

read more

…read more

Source: DRUG POLICY

Avatar of admin

by admin

New York Teachers Unions' 'Choice' Charade

June 2, 2015 in Economics

By Jason Bedrick

Jason Bedrick

The state teachers union may wind up regretting coming out big for parental choice in the recent “opt-out” wars — because the same principle dictates support this month for Gov. Cuomo’s education-tax-credit bill.

This year, more than 200,000 Empire State students refused to take the state’s Common Core assessment exam, up from about 60,000 last year. In several districts, more than half the students opted out.

Perhaps the loudest voice pushing the “opt-out” message has been New York’s largest teachers union. Declaring its support for “a parent’s right to choose,” the New York State United Teachers have actively encouraged parents to opt their children out of the state tests.

NYSUT’s Web site even includes links to resources to help parents opt out if they “decide it is not in their children’s best interests.”

If test results are compromised by low participation, then the test-based accountability systems are toothless, and the union knows it. “Statistically, if you take out enough [students],” NYSUT president Karen Magee recently told reporters, “[the test] has no merit or value whatsoever.”

For low-income students, school choice can be a pathway out of poverty.”

Parents, too, have legitimate concerns — about over-testing, a narrowing curriculum and the loss of local control over their children’s education. Frustrated at their diminished influence in the era of Common Core, parents are exercising one of the few tools they have left.

Of course, if the union really believed its own opt-out rhetoric, they’d realize that parents should be able to opt out of their assigned district schools as well. Cuomo’s proposed Parental Choice in Education Act would do just that.

Cuomo’s proposal would increase funding for public schools while also granting tax credits worth 75 percent of contributions to nonprofit scholarship organizations. These donations would help primarily low- and middle-income families enroll their children in private schools or in out-of-district public schools.

The proposal would also grant tax credits worth up to $500 directly to families earning up to $60,000 a year to cover tuition and fees at their school of choice.

For low-income students, school choice can be a pathway out of poverty. Unfortunately, although NYSUT has adopted the rhetoric of the school-choice movement, the union still vehemently opposes parents’ choice in where to send their kids to school.

Perhaps finding it impolitic to fight against low-income, minority children, NYSUT is engaging in magician-like misdirection. Magee and her allies are trying to recast the scholarship …read more

Source: OP-EDS