Avatar of admin

by

Here's Why Trump Doesn't Need to Replace Justice Kennedy at All — The Supreme Court Could Be Better with 8 Justices

June 27, 2018 in Blogs

By Cody Fenwick, AlterNet

As liberals despair at the prospect of losing a seat to another conservative justice, it's time to consider other options.


With Justice Anthony Kennedy retiring from the Supreme Court to be replaced by a President Donald Trump nominee, the United States risks entering an era in which even a Democratic White House and Congress would struggle to implement a progressive legislative agenda.

This dynamic could deeply fracture the country, entrenching right-wing dominance in the judiciary with the power to effectively nullify the policy preferences of a majority of the country. Partisanship would only increase, and the likelihood of conflict, both outside and inside the government, would rise.

But there's a solution to this problem, and it's even easier to implement with Justice Anthony Kennedy stepping down.

If Trump were to decide not to nominate someone to take his place, and Congress agreed to limit the Supreme Court to eight justices, we might be able to actually reduce partisan tensions in the United States.

Eric Segall, a legal professor at Georgia State University, has been a strong defender of this concept. Contrary to popular opinion, he argues that having an even number of justices would be beneficial for the country:

With four conservatives and four liberals divided along party lines, the justices will have to try harder to reach consensus and will likely decide far more cases, to use Justice Sotomayor’s word, “narrowly.” Those are both beneficial, not negative, side effects of an evenly-divided Supreme Court. The court sets an excellent example for the rest of government and the American people when the justices work hard to reach results both sides can live with (or at least can vote for), especially in our most controversial and important cases.

When the justices do end up splitting on a 4-4 decision, the lower court's ruling will simply hold, which is far from a crisis.

And this move would not be unprecedented. The number of justices fluctuated in the country's early years, but for several decades the court has an even number — just six. It wasn't until 1869 that the Congress landed on the nine-justice court we have …read more

Source: ALTERNET

Leave a reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.