LibertyVoter.Org

By Alex Henderson, AlterNet

If Judge Brett Kavanaugh, President Donald Trump’s nominee to replace Justice Anthony Kennedy on the U.S. Supreme Court, is confirmed by the Republican-controlled Senate—and most likely, he will be—it probably won’t be long before the High Court overturns Roe v. Wade, the landmark 1973 right-to-privacy decision that, in effect, made abortion legal in all 50 states. The end of Roe would not automatically mean a nationwide ban on abortion; rather, the legality or illegality of abortion would be determined on a state-by-state basis. But here’s where it gets even worse: post-Roe, Republicans in Congress would be free to pass a bill calling for abortion to be banned throughout the U.S.—and Trump would no doubt sign it into law. It remains to be seen what will happen in the November midterms, but the way things are shaping up, the events of November 6, 2018 could very well mean the difference between abortion becoming illegal in certain states and abortion becoming illegal throughout the entire country—which is the Christian Right’s ultimate goal.

Democrats are hoping to regain both the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House of Representatives on November 6, and they only need to control one of the two to prevent a nationwide abortion ban. In a post-Roe v. Wade scenario, Republicans would be free to introduce all the anti-abortion bills they wanted in the Senate or the House—but both houses of Congress would have to reach a mutual agreement in order for a bill outlawing abortion nationwide to make it to President Trump’s desk to sign. And if Democrats retake either the Senate or the House, they would have the votes to defeat such a bill. A Democratic majority in either the House or the Senate won’t prevent the U.S. Supreme Court from overturning Roe v. Wade if Kavanaugh is confirmed, but it could at least prevent abortion from being outlawed in all 50 states.

Democrats have some heavy lifting to do if they …read more

Source: ALTERNET

By Cody Fenwick, AlterNet

President Donald Trump's decision to promote the unreleased job numbers at the beginning of June — an apparent violation of a long-standing rule prohibiting officials from commenting on the data — stirred fury and anxiety within the Bureau of Labor Statistics, new emails obtained by Quartz show.

The kerfuffle occurred when Trump tweeted ahead of the BLS's June release: “Looking forward to seeing the employment numbers at 8:30 this morning.” While the president and a few other officials are given the data ahead of the official release, they are prohibited from discussing the numbers publicly within an hour of publication to avoid politicizing the non-partisan work of the Labor Department.

“What an ass,” one employee wrote in response to an article about the president's tweet, according to Quartz.

“I’m guessing there won’t be any repercussions for him,” another reportedly said in an email. “Consequences are for the little people, not bigshots with little hands.” 

One employee, trying to look on the bright side, reportedly wrote that it was at least better that Trump isn't calling the numbers fake, as he did during the campaign.

Quartz also notes that while an internal investigation into the incident has been launched, an official said that Trump himself is not — and could not be — the subject of the investigation.

The outlet obtained the emails through a Freedom of Information Act request because the documents are part of the public record. It chose not to reveal the names of the lower-level employees involved “because the BLS senders have little power over agency operations or government at large.”

The report notes that the employees could nevertheless face retaliation from the upper levels of the Trump administration for criticizing the president.

Related Stories

• 'Ivanka Is No Different': Conservative Writer Slams the President's Daughter for Her Faux Concern About Children
• 'Could These People Be More Vile?': Donald Trump Jr Dragged on Twitter After He Compares the Democratic Party to Nazis
• 'Spinning into a Frenzy': Trump Is Reportedly Getting Desperate as Robert …read more

  Source: ALTERNET

By Kerry Eleveld, Daily Kos

By Cody Fenwick, AlterNet

President Donald Trump's daughter and senior adviser Ivanka Trump was once viewed as a moderating influence over him — but after about a year and a half in office, there's no sign that her more liberal instincts are rubbing off on him.

And during an interview at the Newseum Thursday morning, she confirmed what many suspected: She has no interest in taking any concrete steps to make a real difference at the White House.

Jennifer Rubin, a conservative writer for the Washington Post, argued in an op-ed that no one should no longer have any illusions about Ivanka Trump's failure to uphold a standard of moral decency in the White House.

One of the more notable parts of Ivanka Trump's interview on Thursday addressed the immigrant family separation policy the administration recently put in place, triggering a massive outcry. But while she said the policy was a “low point for me,” Ivanka Trump failed to take any responsibility for it, saying the issue is “incredibly complicated.”

Rubin writes of Ivanka Trump's defense of the policy:

For starters, this is not complicated at all — if one wants to enter the fact-based world. We do not have a border crisis; the zero-tolerance policy was designed to punish migrants and to excite Trump’s base. Not complicated at all. But she is very, very opposed to it, yet not opposed enough to leave the administration, even as hundreds of children remain separated, and not opposed enough to depart from an administration in which officials were directly warned of the potential for significant, lasting psychological harm to the children — and those same officials remain in their jobs.

Rubin also argues that it doesn't appear the president's daughter is actually getting anything substantial by staying at the White House — the paid family leave policy she touted during the campaign isn't going to happen, as she even admitted Thursday morning.

“If she’s holding out for a bill that Republicans and Democrats could pass and her father would sign, she is living in la-la land,” Rubin writes.

“Ivanka is no different from any other enthusiastic member …read more

Source: ALTERNET

By Chris Sosa, AlterNet

Explosive allegations from former White House official Omarosa Manigault-Newman are beginning to emerge in the press ahead of her upcoming tell-all book release.

“Unhinged: An Insider's Account of the Trump White House” will go on sale August 14, but the DailyMail has received excerpts from the book.

One section makes the claim that President Donald Trump is experiencing noticable cognitive decline. 

“While watching the [Lester Holt] interview I realized that something real and serious was going on in Donald's brain. His mental decline could not be denied,” Omarosa writes. “Many didn't notice it as keenly as I did because I knew him way back when. They thought Trump was being Trump, off the cuff [...] But I knew something wasn't right.”

“Donald rambled. He spoke gibberish. He contradicted himself from one sentence to the next,” she elaborated.

According to the book's publisher, Omarosa has known Trump for 15 years but completely severed ties with him following her alleged firing from the White House.

Related Stories

• Watergate Reporter Says Nixon Never Became Publicly 'Unhinged' Like Trump
• Canadians Call BS on The View’s Meghan McCain After She Criticizes Country's Universal Healthcare System
• CNN Panel Derails After Rick Santorum Claims He Can't Hear Host's Question on Tariffs: 'Paris? I'm Missing It'

…read more

Source: ALTERNET