You are browsing the archive for 2018 September 29.

Avatar of admin

by admin

Lindsey Graham Consistently Disregards Violence Toward Women — And His State Is a Women's Murder Capital

September 29, 2018 in Blogs

By Juan Cole, Informed Comment

Graham’s tone deafness to rape victims is nothing new. He has consistently voted against the Violence against Women Act.


Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) made it abundantly clear in the hearing on Thursday that he cares more about Republican Party control of the Supreme Court than about rape victims. He implied that the charges of sexual assault that have surfaced against Brett Kavanaugh are a Democratic Party plot to deny Trump a Supreme Court justice.

He angrily threatened to smear the next Democratic nominee in turn.

Graham’s charge of conspiracy makes no sense, since the Democrats did not make Dr. Blasey Ford come forward, nor did they make the other three women come forward (one, in Montgomery County, has for the time being withdrawn her complaint with the police; perhaps she feared being treated by Graham and his pack hounds the way Dr. Blasey Ford was.)

The Republican evangelicals are always attacking Muslim fundamentalism for not giving equal rights to women. Actually modern Muslim states like Tunisia have women’s equality in the constitution. But it is true that some Muslim fundamentalists argue that a woman’s testimony in court should be worth half that of a man, which makes convicting a man of rape almost impossible. Ironically, the attitude of the Republican men on the Judiciary Committee is the same as would be that of a Muslim fundamentalist. They clearly believe that the testimony of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, a high-powered professor of psychiatry at Palo Atlo and Stanford Universities, counts for less than that of a preppie white elite male.

Graham’s tone deafness to rape victims is nothing new. He has consistently voted against the Violence against Women Act. Indeed, the Republican Congress is going to let the act expire this weekend, ironically the same weekend they will shoehorn Kavanaugh onto the Supreme Court. Nobody on cable news will tell you that or make the connection.

In Graham’s worldview, the Democrats got their nominees, whom he voted for, and they are being beastly to take this one away from the Republicans. But he neglects to mention what was done to Merrick Garland …read more

Source: ALTERNET

Avatar of admin

by admin

With Nation Transfixed By Kavanaugh Monstrosity, House GOP Votes to Give Rich Another $3 Trillion in Tax Cuts

September 29, 2018 in Blogs

By Jake Johnson, Common Dreams

“This is yet another shameful tax law that would swindle working families and siphon even more funding from the programs that help our communities thrive.”


With the nation's attention rightly transfixed by the Senate GOP's monstrous efforts to ram through a Supreme Court nominee who has been credibly accused by multiple women of sexual assault, House Republicans on Friday voted overwhelmingly to approve another $3 trillion in tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans just weeks before the November midterms.

“In less than a year, House Republicans have handed out trillions of tax cuts for the wealthy and big corporations. Now, middle class families are on the hook for higher healthcare costs, and Medicare and Social Security on the chopping block.”

—Rep. Richard Neal

“Today the GOP doubled down on last year's giveaway to the donor class known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act,” Morris Pearl, chair of the Patriotic Millionaires, said in a statement following the 220-191 vote. “Tax Cuts 2.0 gives nearly $3 trillion to the wealthiest Americans, and will become yet another excuse for Republicans to slash Medicare and Social Security.”

“In less than a year, House Republicans have handed out trillions of tax cuts for the wealthy and big corporations,” added Rep. Richard Neal (D-Mass.), ranking member of the House Ways and Means Committee. “Now, middle class families are on the hook for higher healthcare costs, and Medicare and Social Security on the chopping block.”

Three Democrats—Reps. Conor Lamb (Penn.), Jacky Rosen (Nev.), and Kyrsten Sinema (Ariz.)—voted for the GOP-crafted measure, which would permanently extend the individual tax cuts under the current Republican tax law.

According to the an analysis by the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center (TPC), the House GOP's measure—which progressive critics have denounced as “Tax Scam 2.0″—would send the vast majority of benefits to the very top.

“The richest one percent of filers would see an average tax cut of $40,000, while those in the middle 20 percent of earners would see an average cut of $980,” the Washington Post noted in a summary of TPC's findings.

 ”The American people are already paying too high …read more

Source: ALTERNET

Avatar of admin

by admin

Here's What Brett Kavanaugh Should Have Said

September 29, 2018 in Blogs

By Guy Dauncey, Yes! Magazine

“I support the proposal that the FBI be invited to investigate the allegations, so that we may get closer to the truth of what happened.”


Like so many, I watched the Senate hearing on Brett Kavanaugh, transfixed. A lot of us do things in our teenage years that we later regret. It’s how we handle our regrets later that matters. What struck me first was how belligerent and defensive he was—and how entitled and whiney.

He could have adopted an easier approach and won the hearts of all Americans, of whatever political stripe. Since he seems unwilling to do that, I am willing to do it for him:

Honorable Members of the Senate, 

I am testifying today under guidance from the better angels of my nature. I am grateful to you for providing me with this opportunity.  As nominee for a position on the highest court of the land, it behooves me to act with the highest integrity, and in a way that I believe most people wish to see in a possible member of our country’s Supreme Court.

I have no recollection of making any assault on Dr. Ford. In that regard, my memory tells me that I am innocent of the charges laid against me. It is possible, however, that I may be mistaken. Her testimony is totally credible, and it is clear that someone did indeed assault her in the manner she has described. I wish her total support. If it transpires that this person was indeed me, and that it is true that I blacked out or drank so much that I have no memory of the event, I will be profoundly sorry, and I will apologize to her with every fiber of my being and the fullest possible sorrow in my heart.

I would, naturally, withdraw from consideration for a place on the Supreme Court.

I support the proposal that the FBI be invited to investigate the allegations, so that we may get closer to the truth of what happened. It is important that the American public sees justice being pursued in an open, non-evasive manner. It behooves me, …read more

Source: ALTERNET

Avatar of admin

by admin

Is There Anything to Donald Trump's Claim that George Washington Had Skeletons in His Closet?

September 29, 2018 in Blogs

By Rick Shenkman, History News Network

While Washington was treated as a hero during most of American history he came in for a drubbing during the cynical 1920s by self-professed debunkers


 At hisnews conference on Wednesday President Trump dragged George Washington into the fight over the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. This is what Mr. Trump said:

Look, if we brought George Washington here and we said, we have George Washington, the Democrats would vote against him. Just so you understand. And he may have had a bad past, who knows, you know? He may have had some—I think accusations made. Didn't he have a couple of things in his past? George Washington would be voted against 100 percent by Schumer and the con artists. I mean 100 percent. 100 percent. So it really doesn't matter from their standpoint.

We cannot know what he had in mind as he didn't spell out his concerns. But what might he be thinking of?

While Washington was treated as a hero during most of American history he came in for a drubbing during the cynical 1920s by self-professed debunkers like W.E. Woodward. These are the points the debunkers made:

● In his twenties and thirties Washington, a young man on the make, connived to buy up as much land as possible, sometimes unscrupulously.  Early on in his career as a land speculator, when Virginia was still under British rule, he hired a surveyor to stake out land west of the Alleghenies that was off-limits to white settlers. As a colonel during the Seven Years' War, to the disadvantage of his own soldiers,  he made off with the best lands set aside by the British for soldiers who fought in the war.

● He didn't like his mother and in her final years rarely visited her.

● Though he had a reputation as a prude thanks to mythmakers like Parson Weems, the author who concocted the famous cherry tree story, Washington actually love to drink and dance.

Painting by Grant Wood mocking the cherry tree story (1939)

● As a soldier he told crude sex jokes. How bad were they?  You be …read more

Source: ALTERNET

Avatar of admin

by admin

Former US Attorney Explains How Kavanaugh's 'Little Lies' Will Catch Up to Him

September 29, 2018 in Blogs

By Tom Boggioni, Raw Story

Michael Moore — who served as a U.S. Attorney in Georgia — said the FBO investigation into Kavanaugh accuser Christine Ford's claims could open up a Pandora's box from the judge.


Appearing on CNN's New Day, a former U.S. Attorney said that embattled Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh's chances of actually being seated is in danger if a collection of “little lies” he made during his Senate testimony show a pattern of major deceit.

Speaking with CNN host Christi Paul, Michael Moore — who served as a U.S. Attorney in Georgia — said the FBO investigation into Kavanaugh accuser Christine Ford's claims could open up a Pandora's box from the judge.

“I want to ask you,” Paul asked. “How might it affect him, affect the vote if they can't corroborate what Dr. Ford says but can find that there was really serious alcohol use here that did impair his decisions?”

“We've heard about this being a trial and what the burden of proof is,” Moore began. “When you have an investigation, they will look at his credibility. If a witness says he was impaired, passed out, these are small things that we can see that he's maybe not telling the truth about. When you don't tell the truth on the little things, it casts doubt on your version of the big things.”

“If they develop evidence where he's been drinking and passed out, that's a problem,” he continued. “They'll be interested, and frankly, I've been through the background checks, they want to know whether or not you've got an alcohol problem, whether or not you've got a substance abuse problem, has that been going on through his life. he was clear probably a dozen times when he talked about his affinity for drinking beer now. Nothing wrong with somebody having a beer. if this is a pattern through his life, that will end up in a report during his background check.”

Added CNN contributor Rachel Blade, “I do think that this new one [investigation], it puts the nomination in peril for Brett Kavanaugh. there was a meeting where [Senate Majority Leader]Mitch McConnell (R-KY) …read more

Source: ALTERNET